Developer Free Positive Tone Lithography by Thermal Direct Write

This technology has potential environmental and cost saving opportunities as a 2D laser direct write platform for batch processing of computational microchips and other 1D and 2D materials architectures.  

Researchers

Jonathan Singer / Pao-Tai Lin / Edwin Thomas

Departments: Department of Materials Science and Engineering
Technology Areas: Chemicals & Materials: Nanotechnology & Nanomaterials, Polymers / Electronics & Photonics: Lasers
Impact Areas: Advanced Materials

  • developer free positive tone lithography by thermal direct write
    United States of America | Granted | 10,074,544

Technology

Dewetting of thin films as a positive tone process through a variety of focused laser spike (FLaSK) annealing techniques is a relatively nascent technique and has only really begun to show its potential for development-free positive tone patterning of 1D or, barring overlap, 2D structures. As currently presented, it exists in two distinct forms: (1) patterning of isolated trench-ridge lines near the optical limit, and (2) patterning of subwavelength lines by overlapping the exposures. While capability (2) is more exotic, capability (1) should not be diminished; submicron 2D structures in a method that requires no developer step and only uses inexpensive, commodity polymers, free space optics, and visible (sub watt) lasers could be a potentially competitive process, especially for industrial scale fabrication tools where price is a critical concern.  

Problem Addressed

This system is designed to do 2D patterning via a dewetting mechanism that can reach competitive resolutions with current systems without the need for several key attributes: (1) photosensitive media, (2) post-exposure baking, and (3) development. Step (1) has two distinct implications: (1.i) Polymers for dewetting can be much cheaper than photoresist polymers (lab grade polystyrene is ~$0.20 per gram (which is 2 wt% of the solution) and coating solvent is ~$0.05 per mL compared to ~$2 per mL of a typical photoresist) and (1.ii) lab facilities where photosensitive media are handled often must have dark-room-like environments or exposure limits must be enforced. Step (2) simply reduces the number of steps. Step (3) can be a major cost consideration as labs where development is a necessity require both (3.i) a large supply of fresh developer and also (3.ii) the means to dispose of used developer. Removal of this step could present a large reduction in both the chemical costs and also the environmental footprint of a facility. Beyond equipment companies, companies who do their own in-house patterning, such as those who manufacture photomasks and stamps, could employ this method in a custom system to produce grating structures in a much more affordable fashion.  

Advantages

  • Reduced cost and environmental effects
  • Highly scalable  

License this technology

Interested in this technology? Connect with our experienced licensing team to initiate the process.

Sign up for technology updates

Sign up now to receive the latest updates on cutting-edge technologies and innovations.

More Technologies